The novel "Pygmalion" by George Bernard Shaw is considered anti-romantic because it subverts traditional romantic ideals and conventions. The story challenges the notion of love at first sight and instead focuses on the transformation of a lower-class woman, Eliza Doolittle, into a refined lady through education and social grooming. Shaw critiques the superficiality of romantic relationships based on appearances and highlights the importance of individual agency and self-improvement over romantic notions of destiny and fate. Overall, "Pygmalion" presents a more pragmatic and realistic view of relationships and societal expectations.
Related Q&A：
Why the novel Pygmalion is a anti-romantic？-Well, you know, the novel \Pygmalion\ can be seen as anti-romantic for a few reasons. First off, the relationship between the main characters doesn't follow the typical romantic tropes. It's not all hearts and flowers. Instead, there's a lot of manipulation and power play. Also, the focus is more on social class and transformation rather than pure love. The characters' motivations often have more to do with external factors like status and appearance than deep emotional connections. It kind of shows that true romance isn't as simple or straightforward as we might imagine. Oh, and let's not forget the lack of that magical, idealized connection that we usually expect in a romantic story.
